The Fate of SWG Challenges
Mar. 2nd, 2014 01:52 pmIn September 2005, the SWG ran its very first writing challenge, "Strong Women." Challenges have, therefore, always been a part of our group and were part of the original vision when the SWG was founded. We intended to not only offer regular challenges but to keep them open forever, to encourage writers to delve deeper into topics, feel able to conduct more in-depth research, or to write longer works. We currently have more than seventy challenges and present a new challenge every three months.
However, our challenges are not a popular part of what we do. When we ran the numbers, we found that each challenge received an average of two responses, and quite a few challenges had no responses at all. The hard reality of running a group of this size is that we have only a limited amount of volunteer resources, and it serves all SWG members best if we direct that energy toward programs and activities that our members find useful. Given this, the SWG moderators have been discussing what to do with the challenges on our group. Should we continue running them? Should we change the format or how they are presented in order to make them more popular? Or should we recognize that we've reached an end of an era and cease developing new challenges but leave the old challenges available for anyone looking for a plotrabbit or two to get their muses going?
We are very interested in hearing from our members about where they'd like to see our challenges go in the future. Would you be interested in writing stories for challenges on the SWG? Or this not a group that you find conducive to that kind of activity? If you think we should keep the challenges, what do you think we can do to make them more widely used? Would it help to have a way for people to report completing a challenge and spotlight the stories they create in the newsletter? Would it be more motivating to sign up for challenges? Would people like to see customizable challenge elements offered to each writer who wants to participate? Would banners or other rewards be motivating? Something else entirely?
We are very open to any and all ideas. We are not making any decisions at this point but just want to get an idea of what our members are thinking. Please comment here or email us at moderator@silmarillionwritersguild.org to share your thoughts.
However, our challenges are not a popular part of what we do. When we ran the numbers, we found that each challenge received an average of two responses, and quite a few challenges had no responses at all. The hard reality of running a group of this size is that we have only a limited amount of volunteer resources, and it serves all SWG members best if we direct that energy toward programs and activities that our members find useful. Given this, the SWG moderators have been discussing what to do with the challenges on our group. Should we continue running them? Should we change the format or how they are presented in order to make them more popular? Or should we recognize that we've reached an end of an era and cease developing new challenges but leave the old challenges available for anyone looking for a plotrabbit or two to get their muses going?
We are very interested in hearing from our members about where they'd like to see our challenges go in the future. Would you be interested in writing stories for challenges on the SWG? Or this not a group that you find conducive to that kind of activity? If you think we should keep the challenges, what do you think we can do to make them more widely used? Would it help to have a way for people to report completing a challenge and spotlight the stories they create in the newsletter? Would it be more motivating to sign up for challenges? Would people like to see customizable challenge elements offered to each writer who wants to participate? Would banners or other rewards be motivating? Something else entirely?
We are very open to any and all ideas. We are not making any decisions at this point but just want to get an idea of what our members are thinking. Please comment here or email us at moderator@silmarillionwritersguild.org to share your thoughts.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-02 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-02 08:55 pm (UTC)Something that was brought up in our mod discussion was posting to LJ/other satellites when we have a new challenge so that people could comment to officially "sign up"; we could then follow up to collect links to their stories before announcing the next challenge. That's relatively low-key but might increase awareness of/motivation to do the challenges.
And I forgot to say thank you for the feedback! :)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-02 08:58 pm (UTC)That said, it would be more work, and the prospect of success uncertain. One possibility might be to switch the challenges to twice yearly, i.e. make a "bigger deal" of them by less frequency but more publicity when they do happen.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-02 11:02 pm (UTC)I do think round-ups of some sort might help, but of course they would also be more work!
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 03:23 pm (UTC)Thanks for the feedback! :)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 09:34 pm (UTC)What I mean there were some challenges which sounded like something I might actually write, but I sort of went, on reading them: Well, this sounds a bit like story X. But I originally planned that story Y months ago, I'm probably going to finish it Z months from now. How could I then possibly claim I wrote it for this challenge?
Whereas if one or two of the challenges had simply been something like: "in your next story, include a silver spoon" (or whatever)--I might have had a spontaneous idea involving a silver spoon...
Not sure whether that makes sense?
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 10:43 pm (UTC)This is definitely something I will keep in mind and bring up when we actually come to making a decision. Thank you. :)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-02 11:06 pm (UTC)Also, I think the fact is that a lot of Silficcers, namely the newer crowd, are now on A03 and FFN, where it's harder to advertise. I'm not sure about tumblr - maybe promo the Challenge Day/Week (or the challenges themselves) there and see if there's any new blood.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 03:46 pm (UTC)There's always been a large contingent of Silm writers who post on ff.net but not the SWG; I'm not surprised that the same is true of AO3. However, our activity appears to be up on the SWG too (I don't exactly track these things but we had a record number of new registrations in January!) so I think that even if we confine advertising to our own group, we'll get more takers if we make more of an effort, however we decide to present challenges going forward.
Thank you again. :)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 06:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 03:52 pm (UTC)Thanks for the feedback!
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 01:53 pm (UTC)Perhaps promoting the challenges at lj would be good, or maybe in the newsletter you could list the responses to a certain challenge if there are any of them posted at the SWG just like you do with the compilation of stories updated/completed the previous month? Or in a separate, dedicated post at lj, if you wouldn't like to pile up more info to the newsletter.
My two eurocents :)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 03:56 pm (UTC)I agree that listing the stories written for the challenges would be a good addition to the newsletter.
Thanks for the feedback, Binka! :)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 03:41 pm (UTC)I also recommend putting a start and stop date in place for each challenge, similar to LOTR Community challenges. If the topic is right, authors will compose to fit the challenge. I know I would participate more often in this case.
- Erulisse (one L)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 05:09 pm (UTC)I think advertising the prompts on LJ, etc. would be a good way to have more traffic. I also like the idea of releasing them midmonth so they aren't drowned out in the newsletter. I'm less certain of having an official "end" and roundup simply because I know people might consider that a "not allowed to work on anymore" despite information saying otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 10:47 pm (UTC)One of the cool things about the year we did bingo for B2MeM was seeing what people came up with for challenges and what people picked (and what they actually did); it was quite often things I would have never thought of!
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 10:57 pm (UTC)Yeah, that was one of the fascinating things. I still look at the cards occasionally for inspiration!
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 05:46 pm (UTC)In addition to the time sensitive part for getting in the newsletter, maybe there could be some kind of badges not tied to the time? Just something like "5 Challenge Fics Written", "10 Challenge Fics Written", that people could just copy, save, and display when they're reached that milestone. I have no idea how time consuming that would be though, so feel free to ignore it if it'd be a ton of work - I just know I'm easily convinced/reminded to do things by shiny objects/badges.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-03 10:50 pm (UTC)Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this! :)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-04 02:21 am (UTC)I'm glad to hear they wouldn't be onerous and might be possible - when I think back to the challenges that I successfully manage to do (on time and everything!) time after time, the only one that comes to mind is the one where I get shiny little graphics for managing to do so. There, I think I'm somewhere around 30 in a row. You can see the strong correlation between me doing things and shiny objects, at least. :P
(This comment originally posted far too early, sorry for the edit).
no subject
Date: 2014-03-05 06:09 pm (UTC)Most people use challenges as prompts. They should be the people speaking up on this thread. I wouldn't miss them if they were gone. Although I do use them from time to time, but not for the purpose they are intended to serve.
Promoting them more widely or loudly would not change my use or non-use of them at all.